Menu
Menu
L4M1学習ガイドは、世界で非常に効率的なツールです。私たちに知られているように、私たちの現代世界では、誰もがより速く、より良く、よりスマートに物事を行うことを求めているので、生産性ハックが信じられないほど人気があるのも不思議ではありません。そのため、学習ツールの重要性を認識する必要があります。お客様の学習効率を高めるために、当社のL4M1トレーニング資料は、当社の多くの専門家によって設計されました。 L4M1学習教材は、すべての人々が学習効率を向上させるのに非常に役立ちます。
Fast2testのL4M1教材を購入したら、あなたは一年間の無料アップデートサービスを取得しました。試験問題集が更新されると、Fast2testは直ちにあなたのメールボックスにL4M1問題集の最新版を送ります。あなたは試験の最新バージョンを提供することを要求することもできます。最新のL4M1試験問題を知りたい場合、試験に合格したとしてもFast2testは無料で問題集を更新してあげます。
Fast2testを利用するのは君の合格率を１００％保証いたします。Fast2testは多種なCIPS認証試験を受ける方を正確な資料を提供者でございます。弊社の無料なL4M1サンプルを遠慮なくダウンロードしてください。
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
| トピック 5 |
|
質問 # 36
Describe the main differences between a traditional procurement approach and supply chain management approach to buying (25 points)
正解：
解説：
See the solution inExplanation partbelow.
Explanation:
- The question is asking you to explain the following:
- With this type of question you would be expected to discuss 3- 5 differences, giving examples.
Example Essay Structure
Introduction - explain what is meant by 'procurement' and 'SCM' - procurement is the traditional way and is to do with purchasing goods, SCM is the new way which is a more multifaceted way of securing goods and is the result of longer, more complex and more globalised supply chains.
Paragraph 1 - the objectives of each approach (5 Rights vs added value) Paragraph 2 - the approach (reactive buying vs proactive ordering) Paragraph 3 - the way of working (silo working vs cross-functional working) Paragraph 4 - the relationships with suppliers (transactional vs collaborative) Conclusion - There are many differences between the two approaches, and different companies may favour one over the other depending on their specific circumstances. E.g. small organisations that make low value and low risk purchases may take a traditional procurement approach and large multi-national organisations may require a SRM approach due to the volume of suppliers and com-plexities of the supply chains.
Example essay:
Procurement and Supply Chain Management (SCM) represent two distinct approaches to acquiring goods, reflecting the evolution of purchasing practices. Procurement, the traditional method, in-volves the straightforward purchase of goods. In contrast, SCM is a more intricate approach, born out of longer, more complex, and globalized supply chains. This essay explores the main differences between these two approaches, highlighting their objectives, methods, ways of working, and suppli-er relationships.
In the traditional procurement approach, the focus is on achieving the "5 Rights" - getting the right goods, in the right quantity, at the right quality, for the right price, and at the right time. This en-sures efficiency in the purchasing process. On the other hand, SCM goes beyond these basic objec-tives, aiming to add value to the entire supply chain. This might involve developing strategic rela-tionships with suppliers, ensuring sustainability, and aligning with broader organizational goals. For example, a company employing a traditional procurement approach might emphasize getting the lowest price, while an SCM approach could involve working with suppliers to enhance product in-novation or reduce environmental impact.
Secondly, the traditional procurement approach is often reactive, responding to immediate needs or demands. Companies using this method typically make purchases as required, without a long-term strategy. In contrast, SCM involves proactive ordering, anticipating future needs and trends. For instance, a company employing SCM might engage in demand forecasting, allowing for better plan-ning and inventory management. This proactive approach helps prevent stockouts, reduce costs, and enhance overall supply chain efficiency.
Moreover, traditional procurement often involves silo working, where different departments operate independently. The procurement team may not collaborate closely with other departments like pro-duction or marketing. In SCM, there's an emphasis on cross-functional working, breaking down de-partmental barriers for a more integrated approach. For example, an SCM team might work closely with production to ensure materials are aligned with manufacturing schedules, fostering efficiency and minimizing disruptions.
Lastly, in traditional procurement, the relationship with suppliers is transactional - focused solely on the exchange of goods for money. Conversely, SCM promotes collaborative relationships, emphasiz-ing long-term partnerships. A company using SCM might work closely with suppliers to improve processes, share information, and jointly address challenges. For instance, an SCM approach might involve collaborating with suppliers to implement just-in-time inventory systems, leading to cost savings and improved responsiveness.
In conclusion, the differences between traditional procurement and SCM are substantial and nu-anced.
While a traditional procurement approach may suit smaller organizations with low-value and low-risk purchases, larger multinational companies with complex supply chains often find SCM more suitable.
Understanding these differences allows companies to tailor their approach based on their unique circumstances, emphasizing the importance of flexibility and strategic alignment with organizational goals in the ever-evolving landscape of buying and supply chain management.
Tutor Notes
- This question is taken from learning outcome 1.1.1 (p2 onwards). The new study guide has drasti-cally simplified the information on this topic compared to the old syllabus (the table above comes from the old syllabus). This may be good news for students in that you don't need to know as much, but I do wonder if the study guide gives students enough 'content' to write an essay on the subject.
- If a question is to come up from LO 1.1 it would be likely be something like: definitions and dif-ferences between procurement and SCM, difference between a supply chain and a supply network, elements of SCM, or how to add value in the supply chain.
質問 # 37
Describe the key drivers for organisations who operate in the public, private and third sector (25 marks)
正解：
解説：
See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
- There's 2 main approaches to layout you could take for this question. Firstly, divide your essay into three sections for the public, private and third sectors and talk about the key drivers for each sector separately.
Alternatively, you could select a couple of drivers and form paragraphs around them, explaining in each paragraph whether the driver is strong or weak or even applicable for the different sectors.
- Drivers you could talk about include attitudes towards money, survival in the industry, differentiation, need for transparency, resources available, stakeholders, regulatory compliance
- Your answer should say why these are drivers in each of the industries, whether these drivers are strong or weak and why.
Example essay:
Organizations across the public, private, and third sectors operate within different paradigms, driven by distinct motivations and constraints. Understanding these key drivers is essential for comprehending how these organizations function and achieve their objectives. This essay explores the fundamental drivers of organizations in each of these sectors, focusing on attitudes towards money, survival, differentiation, need for transparency, resource allocation, and stakeholder management.
Attitudes Towards Money:
The approach to profit significantly differentiates the sectors. In the private sector, profit is a primary driver, essential for survival and rewarding shareholders. Conversely, the public sector is not profit-driven; its primary aim is to provide essential services to society, regardless of financial gain. The third sector, often termed 'not-for-profit', also requires profit generation, but uniquely, all profits are reinvested into the organization to further its aims, rather than being distributed as shareholder dividends. The Public-Sector needs to 'balance the books' but it is not a profit-generating area of the economy. The priority around money is ensuring that taxpayer money is well spend and that procurement activities represent value for money.
Survival in the Industry:
Survival strategies vary across sectors. Private and third sector organizations must focus keenly on survival, necessitating efficiency and sound business processes. The public sector, by contrast, can continue operating even when inefficient or running at a deficit, as seen in cases like local councils operating with budget shortfalls. This difference underscores a greater urgency for efficient management in the private and third sectors.
Differentiation:
Differentiation is a key driver in the private sector due to competition. Private entities often strive to distinguish their goods or services to gain a competitive edge, either through cost competitiveness or unique offerings. However, differentiation is less of a driver in the public and third sectors, where organizations are often sole providers of certain services or focus on specific social causes without direct competition.
Need for Transparency and Regulatory Compliance:
Transparency and adherence to regulations are paramount in the public and third (not-for-profit) sectors.
These sectors are highly regulated, with public organizations adhering to regulations like the Public Contract Regulations 2015 and third sector organizations following guidelines set by bodies like the Charities Commission. The public's right to information through mechanisms like Freedom of Information requests further underscores this need for transparency. In contrast, the private sector faces less pressure for transparency, though it is not entirely exempt from regulatory compliance.
Resource Availability:
The availability and management of resources are different across sectors. Public and third sector organizations often operate with limited funds, making value for money a critical driver. They must achieve their objectives within these financial constraints. In contrast, the private sector generally has greater flexibility in resource acquisition, able to raise funds through loans or share sales, providing them with a broader scope for investment and expansion.
Stakeholder Management:
Stakeholder dynamics vary significantly among sectors. Public and third sector organizations often have a wide range of stakeholders, though these stakeholders may not wield significant power. Conversely, stakeholders in private organizations, like employees, can exert considerable influence, as seen in cases where employees might strike for better working conditions. Therefore, managing and satisfying stakeholders can be a more pressing concern in the private sector compared to the public sector, where actions like strikes can be legally restricted.
Conclusion:
In summary, organizations in the public, private, and third sectors are driven by different motivations and constraints. While profit is a major driver in the private and third sectors, it serves different purposes in each.
Survival strategies, the need for differentiation, transparency requirements, resource management, and stakeholder relations all vary significantly across these sectors, reflecting the distinct roles and responsibilities they hold in society. Understanding these key drivers is crucial for anyone looking to navigate or interact with these diverse organizational landscapes effectively.
Tutor Notes:
- If you're asked about different sectors of the economy it can be difficult to know what to talk about. An easy way to remember topics you can discuss in your essay is the acronym CAROLS which stands for:
Competition, Activity, Responsibilities, Objectives, Legal Restrictions and Stakeholders. This acronym may generate some ideas of things you can discuss in your essay.
- This question takes some content from different Learning Outcomes throughout L4. Charities are discussed separately from Public and Private Sectors in LO 4.4 p.230.
質問 # 38
Explain FIVE differences between capital expenditure and operational expenditure categories of spend for an organisation.
(25 marks)
正解：
解説：
See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
When discussingcapital expenditure (CapEx) and operational expenditure (OpEx)in the context of procurement and supply, it is essential to understand how they impact an organization's financial planning, decision-making, and procurement strategy. Below arefive key differencesbetween CapEx and OpEx:
1. Definition and Nature of Spend
* Capital Expenditure (CapEx):Refers to investments made by a company to acquire, upgrade, or maintain physical assets such as property, machinery, or equipment. These are typically large, one-time purchases that provide long-term benefits.
* Operational Expenditure (OpEx):Involves day-to-day expenses required to run the business, such as salaries, rent, utilities, and consumables.These costs are necessary for ongoing operations.
2. Accounting Treatment
* CapEx:Considered a long-term investment, it is capitalized and recorded as an asset on the balance sheet. Depreciation or amortization is applied over the useful life of the asset.
* OpEx:Fully expensed in the profit and loss statement in the accounting period in which it is incurred. It directly impacts the organization's profitability in the short term.
3. Budgeting and Approval Process
* CapEx:Requires substantial financial planning, detailed justification, and approval from senior management due to its high-cost implications.It often involves long-term financial commitment.
* OpEx:Generally included in the organization's operating budget and does not require extensive approval processes, as it consists of routine expenses necessary for daily business functions.
4. Impact on Cash Flow and Financial Planning
* CapEx:Affects cash flow significantly as it requires large upfront payments. Organizations often finance CapEx through loans, leasing, or long-term financial strategies.
* OpEx:Represents smaller, recurring costs that are easier to manage and predict within the financial year, allowing for more flexibility in cash flow management.
5. Examples of Procurement and Supply Considerations
* CapEx Examples:Purchasing manufacturing equipment, acquiring new office buildings, upgrading IT infrastructure (e.g., servers, data centers).
* OpEx Examples:Office supplies, utility bills, employee salaries, maintenance and repair costs, software subscriptions.
Conclusion
Understanding the distinction betweencapital expenditure and operational expenditureis essential for procurement and supply professionals to make informed financial decisions, align with corporate strategy, and ensure efficient resource allocation. Procurement teams must consider factors such as cost-benefit analysis, funding sources, and long-term value when determining the best approach for an organization's spending strategy.
質問 # 39
What is meant by Stakeholder Mapping? Describe a tool that can be used by a Procurement Professional to map the stakeholders at their organisation (25 points)
正解：
解説：
See the solution inExplanation partbelow.
Explanation:
How to approach this question:
- Define stakeholder mapping - completing an analysis of the stakeholders of an organisation and dividing them into categories depending on certain characteristics. This is often represented visually on a graph or matrix.
- Describe a Stakeholder mapping tool - the most common tool is Mendelow's Stakeholder Matrix so I would recommend using this one. It is explained in detail in the study guide. However, the question is open so you could choose to describe another tool such as Edgar's Stakeholder Position Analysis if you so wished. You wouldn't be wrong choosing this, but honestly, I'd just go for Mendelow. You can't go wrong with Mendelow.
Because the Matrix has 4 sections you can imagine you'd get 5 points for the definition of stakeholder mapping, and 5 points for each of the quadrants of the matrix.
Essay Plan:
Introduction - The reason why stakeholder mapping is important is because interests and expectations of stakeholder groups will be different and possibly conflicting. Mapping this allows an organisation to see the variety and decide on an appropriate management style for each stakeholder group.
Paragraph 1 - Mendelow's Power / Interest Matrix maps stakeholders based on their influencing power and the strength of their motivation to use that power. It uses a 2x2 grid and defines power as high or low and interest and high or low. It then provides four strategies for managing the stakeholders based on which quadrant of the grid the stakeholder falls into. These 4 categories are:
Paragraph 2 - Keep satisfied - high power but low interest. If the stakeholder becomes dissatisfied or concerned their interest may peak. Examples include regulatory bodies, shareholders, senior management. The best approach is to keep them up to date so they are informed of what is going on, but do not burden them with information they do not need.
Paragraph 3 - Manage Closely - AKA Key players - includes major customers, key suppliers, partners, senior management. These stakeholders need to know everything that is going on and approve of what is going on.
The recommended strategy is early involvement and participation, and integrating their goals with yours. This group requires regular communication and meetings. You should take their opinions on board.
Paragraph 4- Monitor - minimum effort required - this is the low priority group as they have low power and low interest. Includes small volume suppliers and other organisational functions with no direct interest in your activities. This group does not need to receive regular communication.
Paragraph 5 - Keep informed - high interest, but low power. If they're not kept in the loop and understand the need for decisions, they may lobby together to protect their interest if they feel threatened. Employee groups, suppliers and community groups may be in this category. This group should receive regular communication.
Conclusion - Mendelow created the matrix in 1991 and it is still used today. It is a popular management tool due to its simplicity. It's important to notes that stakeholders can move through the matrix- it isn't stagnant.
For example, at the beginning of a project a manager in another department may be classed as 'low priority' because they are seen to have no interest and no power in the project. However, as the project progresses the manager may become interested. They will then transfer into the keep informed category. Therefore, the matrix should be redone regularly throughout the lifetime of a project to capture any movements. The matrix should also be redone for each individual project - it cannot be assumed that a stakeholder who had interest in one project would be interested in another.
Tutor Notes
- The above essay plan is basically the entire essay, I got carried away. The only thing you'd need to add into that is an example of a stakeholder for each of the sections! (e.g. the CEO is high power, but low interest stakeholder for the procurement department. He/ She doesn't care about the day to day operations but should be kept informed of any big news). For your examples you could use your own place of work.
- At level 4 you don't have to analyse the model, you just have to be able to memorise it and repeat it.
Mendelow comes up again at Level 5 and 6 in a bit more detail. If you want to score super bonus points you could mention in your conclusion that the main disadvantage of Mendelow's Matrix is that it doesn't take into consideration the stakeholder's position on the project - whether they're for it or against it. Therefore, it doesn't provide the full picture or provide much help on how to manage stakeholders. E.g. two stakeholders might both be in 'manage closely' section, but one is for the project and the other against - they'd need to be handled very differently!
- Study guide p. 65
質問 # 40
Sarah is thinking of setting up a charity in the UK which will look after animals that have been abandoned.
What regulations and governing bodies should Sarah be aware of when setting up her charity? (25 Points)
正解：
解説：
See the solution inExplanation partbelow.
Explanation:
How to approach this question
- Your essay should mention at least one regulation and one governing body particular to the charity section and I would recommend these be the Charities Act 2011 and the Charities Commission.
- If you don't know a lot about the sector you can bring up more generalised regulations and governing bodies, such as financial conduct and the Equalities Act, but make sure it's relevant to Sarah. Her charity is a small, local one, so things like Modern Slavery Act will not be appropriate to talk about.
Example Essay
When setting up a charity in the UK, particularly one focused on animal welfare, there are several regulations and governing bodies that Sarah should be aware of. These ensure that the charity operates legally, ethically, and effectively.
A charity's purpose involves raising awareness and helping someone or something, in Sarah's case this will be local animals and potentially their owners. A charity has to satisfy two aspects: The benefit aspect and The public aspect. In the UK, both aspects are regulated by the Charities Act 2011.
To satisfy a benefit aspect, a charity must: have a purpose that must be beneficial to the community it works in
- this must be in a way that is identifiable and capable of beingproved by evidence. For Sarah this would be showing that her charity helps animals, potentially by taking them in off the street or removing them from dangerous homes and caring for them.
To satisfy a public aspect, a charity must benefit the public in general, or a sufficient section of the public. In Sarah's case the public benefit may be in removing stray dogs and cats from the streets where they can transport diseases and potentially attack people. Most charities strive to satisfy both aspects but in some cases this is not possible.
All charities are regulated. Because charities are funded by donations from the public, businesses and sometimes from government, their conduct is regulated closely. Key regulatory bodies that Sarah will have to engage with include:
1. Charity Commission for England and Wales:
As the primary regulator for charities in England and Wales, the Charity Commission oversees the registration and regulation of charities. Sarah's organization must meet the legal definition of a charity and apply for registration if its income is over £5,000 per year.
The Commission ensures compliance with the Charities Act, offering guidance on charity governance, financial management, and reporting.
2. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC):
Charities can apply to HMRC for recognition as a charity for tax purposes. This status allows for tax reliefs and exemptions, including Gift Aid on donations.
HMRC ensures compliance with tax obligations and scrutinizes the use of charity funds.
3. Data Protection:
Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018, any charity handling personal data must ensure its protection and comply with data privacy laws.
4. Health and Safety Executive (HSE):
The HSE provides guidelines for workplace safety, which are important if the charity has employees or volunteers.
In conclusion there are many regulations and bodies that Sarah should be aware of when setting up her charity.
Sarah should consider seeking legal advice or consulting with charity advisory services to ensure full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations. Additionally, staying informed about changes in charity law and animal welfare legislation would be beneficial to the smooth operation of her charity.
Tutor Notes
- With case study questions you're not expected to know anything about the specific topic, in this case Animal Charities. If it happens to be something you know about, you can bring in some of your own knowledge, but this isn't a requirement to get a good score. You're not expected to know, for example about the Animal Welfare Act 2006, but if you happen to do so, it could be a nice little thing to add in. Just don't focus your essay on it. However you can make some sensible guesses on what Sarah will be doing, for example I talked about removing stray animals from the street.
- Charities comes up in LO 4.4 p.232
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
質問 # 41
......
時代の発展に伴い、人間的な文明が発展し、Fast2testも発展しています。Fast2testは君の早くCIPSのL4M1認定試験に合格するために、きみのもっと輝い未来のために、君の他人に羨ましいほど給料のために、ずっと努力しています。長年の努力を通じて、Fast2testのCIPSのL4M1認定試験の合格率が１００パーセントになっていました。Fast2testを選ぶなら、成功を選ぶのに等しいです。
L4M1試験対策: https://jp.fast2test.com/L4M1-premium-file.html